Adultery Cuckold---Is wife worthy for Second chance? by INDIAN_MAVERICK1190-Completed

[Ramesh_Rocky]

akarsh1970:


It is also immature for a man on the later side of his 40s , a professor and father to go ballistic. It is a finding, not evidence. An academic should be able to make out that difference. What if it had been planted there or worse, what if it had been the residua of coerced sex? Brijesh doesn't know that his wife had engaged in consensual sex.

I can understand a young and jealous boyfriend storming off but a mature and professional husband. Not acceptable.

Besides the threat of social ostracisation, makes him such a shallow person. Agreed his wife had a sexual dalliance outside of marriage. But to lose his own convictions in response to that is also shameful. Two wrongs do not make a right.

These are completely artificial arguments and appear like the kind of arguments that are presented for the sake of arguing. A person with a 12 year old marriage is bound to go ballistic when he or she finds that their spouse has cheated on them. A person with a 1 year old marriage is bound to be less emotionally invested in the marriage and can be expected to be less disturbed.

In real life, I have not heard of a single criminal case where a person has planted underwear in someone's house. Why would anyone do that? Further, the husband does not simply storm off and send divorce papers. He does ask the wife about what has happened and whether she had consensual sex. Should the husband fix an appointment with the wife to question her at a later date and time so that she has more opportunity to prepare lies?

And, even when the wife lies and claims a one night stand, Maverick specifically writes that the husband notes and speaks out loud that the wife is not claiming bang. The couple had repeatedly spoken on the phone. If there was coerced sex, then the wife would be expected to at least discuss that with the husband and expect his support, if not straight away go to the security officer. This is a working woman from a well off family, not some poor illiterate woman who could be expected to be too frightened to reveal bang. Also, this is a 12 year old marriage - so the wife would be expected to at least share the bang incident with the husband and expect his emotional support.

The wife has a prolonged affair without any concern for social ostracism - but the husband is expected to tolerate the affair for fear of social ostracism? What kind of logic is this? Is the husband going to be more hurt by the wife's betrayal or should he bother more about outsiders and social ostracism? Further, the husband is not a cheat - why should he fear ostracism?

Losing his convictions? The wife has betrayed him and broken all his conviction and faith in her. In light of the evidence, is he not even expected to question the wife immediately? Should he tell the wife that he has discovered potential evidence of her cheating but like a retard, he would continue to believe her, ignore the evidence and not even question her because of his convictions? He found evidence that shattered his convictions, put a question mark on his marriage and he immediately asked his wife about it - this is what any spouse would do, man or woman.