Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Seconds from Disaster
Seconds from Disaster is a US/UK-produced documentary television programme that investigates historically relevant man-made and natural disasters from the 20th century. Each episode aims to explain a single incident by analyzing the causes and circumstances that ultimately effected the disaster. The program uses re-enactments, interviews, testimonies, and CGI (Computer-generated imagery) to analyze the sequence of events second-by-second for the audience.
Seconds from Disaster was first broadcast on the National Geographic Channel in 2004 and originally consisted of 45 episodes over three seasons. Following its original conclusion in 2007, the show was put on a four-year hiatus and later replaced with Critical Situation. In 2011, National Geographic revived the show and aired another 22 episodes over three seasons until the following year. Narrators of the show are Ashton Smith (American narrator for seasons 1 to 3), Richard Vaughan (British narrator for every season except 3), and Peter Guinness (British narrator for season 3).
The show was revived again, with the first episode of season 7 airing on February 15, 2018. Its return has been paired with the 17th Season UK Premiere of Air Crash Investigation, which aired back to back beginning on February 15 at 8PM on National Geographic UK's channel.
Format
Seconds from Disaster is characterised by an emphasis on chronological sequencing (in accordance with the show's name), the use of CGI technology and its blueprint-like CGI format. The show has little or no dialogue for the actors in the re-enactments, but instead is almost entirely dominated by the narrator.
Each episode begins with a chronological re-enactment of the disaster, which is always cut into several scenes displaying critical moments in the unfolding of the disaster with a clock appearing at the beginning of each scene. After the sequence of events, the show "winds back" the scenes to analyse the causes and events leading up to the disaster. The series uses blueprint-formatted CGI in every episode to reveal the anatomy of the disaster and the structures involved but in season 3, the blue formatting of the CGI is not used on the background and is replaced with a white background. From season 4 onwards, they used a sepia-like background. The show concludes with the original disaster scenes being rewind and played again; but this time, the clock is being replaced by a countdown timer and the conclusions reached from the analysis being put together with the sequence. Most often, the show finishes with a short moment of sentimentality (where those involved often speak of their emotions on the disaster) followed by the technological advances made to prevent similar disasters from happening again.
Other Tv series similar to this are:
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
Posts: 5
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 2 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Apr 2019
Reputation:
0
Thanks, nice subject.
The tables above contain more valuable and precise information than just serving as an index.
How ever, waiting for video links.
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
1- Crash of the Concorde
Air France Flight 4590 was a Concorde flight operated by Air France which was scheduled to fly from Charles de Gaulle Airport near Paris, to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City. On 25 July 2000, it crashed into a hotel in Gonesse, France. All one hundred passengers and nine crew members on board the flight died. On the ground, four people were killed and one critically injured.
The flight was chartered by German company Peter Deilmann Cruises; the passengers were on their way to board the cruise ship MS Deutschland in New York City for a 16-day cruise to Manta, Ecuador.[1][2] This was the only fatal Concorde accident during its 27-year operational history.
Post-accident investigation revealed that the aircraft was at or over the maximum takeoff weight for ambient temperature and other conditions, and 810 kilograms (1,790 lb) over the maximum structural weight.[BEA 1][BEA 2][3][4] As it left the gate, it was loaded such that the centre of gravity was aft of the take-off limit.[BEA 3] Fuel transfer during taxiing left the number five wing tank 94% full.[BEA 4] A twelve-inch spacer that normally keeps the left main landing gear in alignment had not been replaced after recent maintenance; however, the French Bureau for Accident Investigation concluded that this did not contribute to the accident.[5][BEA 5] The wind at the airport was light and variable that day, and was reported to the cockpit crew as an eight knot tailwind as they lined up on runway 26R.[BEA 6]
Five minutes before the Concorde, a Continental Airlines DC-10 departing for Newark, New Jersey, had lost a titanium alloy strip (part of the engine cowl, identified as a wear strip), 435 millimetres (17.1 in) long, 29 to 34 millimetres (1.1 to 1.3 in) wide and about 1.4 millimetres (0.055 in) thick,[BEA 7] during takeoff from the same runway. A runway inspection, scheduled for an hour and a half before the Continental airplane took off, had not been carried out.[BEA 8][6]
During the Concorde's takeoff run, this piece of debris still lying on the runway, was run over, cutting a tyre and rupturing it. A large chunk of tyre debris (4.5 kilograms or 9.9 pounds) struck the underside of the aircraft's wing at an estimated speed of 140 metres per second (310 mph).[BEA 9] Although it did not directly puncture any of the fuel tanks, it sent out a pressure shockwave that ruptured the number five fuel tank at the weakest point, just above the undercarriage. Leaking fuel gushing out from the bottom of the wing was most likely ignited by an electric arc in the landing gear bay or through contact with hot parts of the engine.[BEA 10] At the point of ignition, engines one and two both surged and lost all power, but engine one slowly recovered over the next few seconds.[BEA 11] A large plume of flame developed; the Flight Engineer then shut down engine two, in response to a fire warning and the Captain's command.[BEA 12] Air traffic controller Gilles Logelin noticed the flames before the Concorde was airborne, however with only 2 km (1.2 mi) of runway remaining and travelling at a speed of 328 km/h (204 mph), its only option was to take off. The Concorde would have needed at least 3 km (1.9 mi) of runway to abort safely.
Having passed V1 speed, the crew continued the takeoff, but the plane did not gain enough airspeed with the three remaining engines,[citation needed] because damage to the landing gear bay door prevented the retraction of the undercarriage.[BEA 13] The aircraft was unable to climb or accelerate, maintaining a speed of 200 knots (370 km/h; 230 mph) at an altitude of 60 metres (200 ft). The fire caused damage to the port wing, which began to disintegrate—melted by the extremely high temperatures. Engine number one surged again, but this time failed to recover. Due to the asymmetric thrust, the starboard wing lifted, banking the aircraft to over 100 degrees. The crew reduced the power on engines three and four in an attempt to level the aircraft, but with falling airspeed they lost control and the aircraft stalled, crashing into the Hôtelissimo Les Relais Bleus Hotel near the airport
The crew was trying to divert to nearby Le Bourget Airport, but accident investigators stated that a safe landing, given the aircraft's flight path, would have been highly unlikely.
As the cockpit voice recorder (CVR) transcript recorded it,[10] the last intelligible words in the cockpit (translated into English) were:
Co-pilot: "Le Bourget, Le Bourget, Le Bourget."
Pilot: "Too late (unclear)."
Control tower: "Fire service leader, correction, the Concorde is returning to runway zero nine in the opposite direction."
Pilot: "No time, no (unclear)."
Co-pilot: "Negative, we're trying Le Bourget" (four switching sounds).
Co-pilot: "No (unclear)."
Mega Disasters,S01E01,Concorde (Aircraft Model),Aircraft (Type Of Fictional Setting),Seconds From Disaster (TV Program),Aviation Accident Or Incident (Cause Of Death),Air France Flight 4590 (Aviation Incident)
•
Posts: 14,639
Threads: 247
Likes Received: 18,067 in 9,539 posts
Likes Given: 1,859
Joined: Nov 2018
Reputation:
379
•
|